Bombardier – Case Study

Challenge: To dispose of masking material from the painting of airplanes. During the process, light bulky material, mostly paper, disposable protective clothing, plastic and tape needs to be compacted within the painting area. The material, which includes paint containing chrome, is considered hazardous. They required an industrial waste compactor that could meet the Class II, Division II requirements.
Solution: KenBay designed the RotoPacBlastPac Hazardous and Explosive Environment Waste Compactor.
Result: The custom compactor meets their requirements.

Advance Pierre – Case Study

Challenge: The debris from unpacking the raw material from 6 production lines operating 2 shifts per day reduced the company’s efficiency.
Solution: They selected the KenBay RotoPac industrial compactors with its continuous compaction to receive and compact the debris at the source of the waste, i.e., at the start of each production line where the raw materials were unpacked.
Result: The waste compacted into large polyethylene filled bags weighing over 500 lbs are then removed by forklift eliminating any manual labor involvement.

Alexandra Food – Case Study

Challenge: Disposing of the waste cardboard and plastic shipping and packing materials associated with the production of products placed an undue burden upon them.
Solution: Their founder resolved their company’s problems by ordering the KenBay RotoPac, the leading industrial arm compactor, on Nov. 25th.
Result: By the 27th, the RotoPac was up and running, compacting 5 full bags of waste on the same day. He said: “For our application this machine is just excellent. We’ve been in business for almost 20 years and I have been looking for hand’s-off compactor like this for at least 5 years.”

Boehringer-Ingelheim – Case Study

Challenge: Two production lines produced a voluminous amount of waste, clogging their facilities. One line was generating 6 gaylords of shrink-wrap per day. Maintenance workers were spending too much time carting and removing the waste. The other line required the collection and compaction of aluminum.
Solution: A standard rotary arm RotoPac was placed at the end of each line.

Nestles – Case Study

Challenge: Reduce the cost of hauling waste to the nearest Waste to Energy facility to make the process cost effective.
Solution: Use the RotoPac with its high compaction ratio to package the waste into 4’ cubes for cost effective transport.
Result: Making the process of hauling waste that here-to- for could not be cost effectively transported long distances to a Waste to Energy facility for incinerating it into energy bricks.

See How a Cubic Yard Box Inspired a Reduction in Bulk Waste Costs by 90%

It won’t come as any surprise to most folks that bulk waste has high associated disposal costs. We’d like to share a story about a West Coast Aircraft Service Facility client of ours who serves the aircraft industry and the waste they produce is considered hazardous, which adds a whole additional level of complexity to the situation! The story begins with the switch to a Cubic Yard Box!

Jim Kirby works in Paint Operations; the paint masking material contains chrome related primers and requires a Class 1 Fire Protection Unit. Their operations used to consist of using a RotoPac® they rented from KenBay along with a 40 yard roll-off bin. The first round of compaction was done in 55 gallon metal drums, compacted again in the RotoPac and the waste was shipped to their hazardous waste vendor in Tennessee who would put the waste into a cubic yard box and ship the boxes to fuel blend. There were several associated costs with this approach, and as you can imagine, those costs quickly added up to a big expense.

One day their hazardous waste vendor made a change that sparked a huge savings for Jim’s company. They started requiring the waste be put into a hazardous waste rated cubic yard box instead of the bags they had used historically. It was important to find the most efficient way to accommodate this change. Since there was already collaborative relationship with KenBay and they were already renting a RotoPac, it made sense to start with KenBay. Don Meis, the founder of KenBay spent time researching the new requirements and he presented a simple solution. There was a way to outfit the RotoPac so that it could compact waste directly into the cubic yard box.

kenbay rotopacThe modification included the following:

  • Remove the protection shield
  • Stabilize the Unit to ensure the cubic yard box doesn’t move during compaction
  • Use a shorter RotoPac drum
  • Install guard rails to prevent the boxes from expanding as waste was compacted

That did the trick!

So their old process which required 55 gallon metal drums, a 40 yard roll-off bin, liners, transport to Tennessee and finally shipping in a cubic yard box to fuel blend, was all reduced to onsite waste compaction indoors without exposing the environment to the hazardous waste, with better logistics, better security and lower costs!

We mentioned 90% savings. Can that be true? Let’s take a look at the numbers:

  • For the first 6 months of 2015, the costs utilizing the 40 yard roll off and shipping to TN prior to shipping to fuel blend totalled $141,000
  • For the second 6 months of 2015, the costs of using a customized RotoPac, compacting on-site and shipping to fuel blend on the west coast totalled $14, 500
  • An annual savings of $126,500!

The great part of this story is how they captured all associated costs and eventual savings as a result of making a few changes to their RotoPac compactor. How many of us pay the bills on a monthly basis without wondering how things could be done smarter and more cost effectively?

The costs for the old process came from various sources:

  • 55 gallon metal drums
  • The roll-off bin had to be kept outdoors, required a lid and regular maintenance and it took up a lot of physical space.
  • Liners for the RotoPac
  • Labor of transporting waste from paint operations to the outdoors where the 40 yard roll off was kept
  • Pulls from the 40 yard roll-off bin cost $20k per pull and they averaged 10 pulls per year.
  • Paying the hazardous waste vendor for the labor, fuel and materials required to put waste in a cubic yard box, blend and ship.

In 2016 Jim decided it was time to stop renting the RotoPac from KenBay and purchase it outright and he hasn’t looked back! Contact us at KenBay. Explain your specific sources of waste and we’ll recommend a process that is safe, efficient and cost effective. It would be our pleasure!

Sea Ray – Case Study

SeaRay

  • Challenge: Maker of luxury sea craft needed to reduce the number of workers associated with trash removal to reassign them to other tasks.
  • Solution: The RotoPac industrial waste compactor is situated at the source of the waste. At the plant they have placed two rotary arm compactors, the RotoPacs directly on the assembly line and one in the distribution center to manage the 60 tons of trash.
  • Result: Reduced disposal costs, labor hours and workplace accidents. Prior to this dumpsters had to be emptied eight to ten times a day by two forklift operators who emptied the smaller dumpsters into a larger open-top dumpster at a remote location. Now trips to the dumpster have been significantly reduced.  Also an added benefit of reducing forklift traffic within the facility is that a safety concern has been alleviated. Client indicates that the RotoPac is easy to install and does not require a full-time operator like a baler does.  They were able to reduce staff hours and pay for the RotoPacs within a year.

(more…)

Purolator – Case Study

  • Challenge: Client had voluminous amount of paper products and improperly made filters.  The extra paper accumulation was so bad that it was blocking their distribution docks by constantly transporting dumpsters to be emptied.  They had 6 dumpsters throughout the plant that were being dumped 32 times per day.
  • Solution:  Now the RotoPac bags are removed 5 or 6 times per day.
  • Result: By reducing the forklift travel they reduced the maintenance on their fleet, picked up more plant floor space to use in production and calculated $52,000 annual savings in fork lift operator costs.

(more…)

Hoshizaki – Case Study

  • Challenge: Their production assembly floor was being clogged by large amounts of cardboard dunnage discarded from receiving components. Removal of the waste materials required fourteen trips daily to move and empty the full collection hoppers to the rear of the facility.
  • Solution: They installed a RotoPac and placed it at the source of the waste, right on their production assembly floor.
  • Result: Not only have they reduced the amount of trips necessary to remove the cardboard to one a day, but it has also resulted in annual saving of 50% more than the cost of the RotoPac.

(more…)

Boeing – Case Study

  • Challenge: The facility generates a huge amount of trash, disparagingly referred to as Foreign Object Debris (F.O.D.), considered lethal to an aircraft.
  • Solution: Client purchased approximately 50 RotoPac™ industrial waste compactors and placed them throughout the production area.
  • Result: They are able to compact at a 10-1 ratio (customer’s figure) saving money and personnel needed to handle the volume of F.O.D. Under the current system, trash removal has gone from as much as six times a day to only once a day. The company’s move to the Rotary Arm Compactor, the RotoPac™ has enabled production workers to concentrate on the manufacturing process and not waste handling.
    The RotoPac™ industrial waste compactor has a 4-ft. x 5-ft. footprint equal to one of the metal trash boxes it replaced. That meant a significance savings of valuable shop space as one plastic bag of compacted trash equaled 10 boxes. Client places great emphasis on employee safety and the introduction of the “at-the-source” compactor has virtually eliminated the risk of injuries created by the heavy metal carts. The RotoPac industrial waste compactor is a very safe and easy to use compactor, requiring minimal training and allows production personnel to work on assembling aircraft, not carting away trash.

(more…)